![]() ![]() The NHTSA grant funded equipment purchases, some logistics, and the evaluation. In March 1994, Tennessee initiatedĪ statewide impaired driving checkpoint program labeled " Checkpoint Tennessee." ![]() The state and evaluate the effects of that program. Tennessee to conduct a highly publicized sobriety checkpoint program throughout In 1993, NHTSA entered into a cooperative agreement with the State of In a state that was willing to change its philosophy and approach about checkpoints. Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) decided to conduct a demonstration project Their random breath testing (RBT) program (Homel, 1990), the National Highway have embarked on statewide sobriety checkpoint programs.īased upon their potential effectiveness, and the strong evidence from Australia on While these results have been encouraging, for various reasons (Ross 1992b) veryįew states in the U.S. In the United States (U.S.) on a local level. However, until recently, checkpoints have generally only been implemented Support for the proposition that sobriety checkpoints are capable of reducing theĮxtent of alcohol-impaired driving and of deaths and injuries on the highway (Ross,ġ992a). In a review of the literature, it was concluded that theĪccumulation of positive findings for visible and well-publicized checkpoints provide Sobriety checkpoints have long been known to be an effective impaired drivingĮnforcement method. Table 3-3: Responses to Selected Questions on Opinions and Behavior Table 3-2: Response to Questions about Exposure to Highway Safety Programs Table 3-1: Attributes of Driver Survey Respondents, Percentage by Wave
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |